Answers

Name:

Sofie Enstrøm

Organisation:

PlanBørnefonden

Response:

1. It would be relevant to look at how future scenarios for Mali (identified in the Transition Programme) are anticipated to affect FACEJ II and the expected results. 2. It is very relevant with the unallocated funds of 1.8% that could be used as a crisis modifier to adapt to the changing context and needs during the programme period - but it would be relevant with a higher percentage to account for the very volatile and difficult context FACEJ II will be operating in. 3. The proposed project time frame of only 3 years will limit the possibilities for FACEJ II to conclude all activities and reach the expected results - it will be relevant to look at possibilities of prolonging FACEJ II. 4. It should be envisaged that FACEJ II takes over the ongoing engagements from FACEJ I at the level of the entrepreneurs, facilitators, and banks and are not possible to close before the start of FACEJ II.

File: